<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Article III standing on Texas Appeals Journal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/topics/article-iii-standing/</link><description>Clinical descriptions of the Texas appellate decisions drawing the most press coverage.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 07:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://texasappeals.org/topics/article-iii-standing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fifth Circuit Vacates Injunction Against Texas Sexually Oriented Performance Law on Standing Grounds, Remands First Amendment Question</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/11/woodlands-pride-v-paxton-sb-12/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/11/woodlands-pride-v-paxton-sb-12/</guid><description>The court held that 360 Queen Entertainment established standing to seek an injunction against the Attorney General of Texas under Section One of Senate Bill 12, and that the other plaintiffs did not establish standing against the remaining appellants. It did not decide whether the law violates the First Amendment, remanding for the district court to apply *Moody v. NetChoice*.</description></item><item><title>Fifth Circuit Holds DACA Final Rule Violates the Immigration and Nationality Act but Limits Relief to Texas and Leaves Forbearance Provisions Intact</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/01/texas-v-united-states-daca-rule/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/01/texas-v-united-states-daca-rule/</guid><description>The court held that Texas has standing under its earlier decision, that the 2022 DACA rule is materially identical to the 2012 memorandum and substantively violates the INA, and that the district court erred by not severing the rule’s forbearance provisions; it narrowed the injunction to Texas. The stay protecting existing recipients remains in place.</description></item></channel></rss>