<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>due process on Texas Appeals Journal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/topics/due-process/</link><description>Clinical descriptions of the Texas appellate decisions drawing the most press coverage.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 07:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://texasappeals.org/topics/due-process/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals Affirms Capital Murder Conviction and Death Sentence in Bowie County Case</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/12/parker-v-state-capital-direct-appeal/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/12/parker-v-state-capital-direct-appeal/</guid><description>The court held that the evidence was sufficient for a rational juror to find that the infant removed from the victim’s body was “born and is alive” when the defendant kidnapped or attempted to kidnap her, and it overruled twenty-four other points of error on the merits or for lack of preservation or briefing. A concurrence addressed the Penal Code’s two definitions of “individual.”</description></item><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Convicting Court Lacked Jurisdiction Over Death-Row Inmate’s Constitutional Habeas Challenge to Execution Drugs</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/10/ex-parte-speer-capital-habeas/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/10/ex-parte-speer-capital-habeas/</guid><description>In a per curiam opinion, the court held that a Bowie County district court had no jurisdiction over a constitutional habeas application seeking to bar the Texas Department of Criminal Justice from using allegedly expired and fire-damaged pentobarbital in a scheduled execution, because such an injunction would function as a stay of execution that only the Court of Criminal Appeals may grant. The court did not reach the merits of the method-of-execution claims.</description></item><item><title>Fifth Circuit Panel Enjoins Removals Under Alien Enemies Act, Holding March 2025 Proclamation Does Not Identify an Invasion or Predatory Incursion</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/09/wmm-v-trump-alien-enemies-act-panel/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/09/wmm-v-trump-alien-enemies-act-panel/</guid><description>A divided panel held that the President’s fact-findings under the 1798 Act are unreviewable but the statutory labels attached to them are not, and that the findings in Proclamation No. 10903 do not describe an invasion or predatory incursion. Two judges concluded that, on the current record, the Government’s updated seven-day notice satisfies due process; the court remanded for evidence on a sufficient timeframe.</description></item><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals, on Rehearing, Withdraws 2024 Opinion and Holds Ethics Commission Referral Is Not a Precondition to Election-Law Prosecution</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/09/ex-parte-charette-rehearing/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/09/ex-parte-charette-rehearing/</guid><description>On the State’s motion for rehearing, the court withdrew its September 2024 opinion and affirmed the denial of pretrial habeas relief to a former judicial candidate. It held that neither the Texas Constitution nor Government Code Chapter 571 categorically bars a criminal prosecution for election-law offenses brought without a referral from the Texas Ethics Commission or exhaustion of its civil process, while reaffirming that the habeas claim was cognizable.</description></item><item><title>Supreme Court Enjoins Alien Enemies Act Removals of Detainees in Northern District of Texas and Vacates Fifth Circuit’s Dismissal of Their Appeal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/05/aarp-v-trump-alien-enemies-act-injunction/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/05/aarp-v-trump-alien-enemies-act-injunction/</guid><description>In a per curiam opinion, the Court held that the Fifth Circuit erred in dismissing the detainees’ appeal for lack of jurisdiction, concluded that the notice given on April 18 was inadequate, and enjoined removals under the Act pending further proceedings. The opinion states that it does not address the legality of removals under the Act.</description></item><item><title>Fifth Circuit Vacates Capital Murder Conviction of Brittany Holberg, Holding State Court Unreasonably Applied Brady to Undisclosed Informant Evidence</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/03/holberg-v-lumpkin-capital-habeas/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/03/holberg-v-lumpkin-capital-habeas/</guid><description>A divided panel held that evidence the State did not disclose—that a jailhouse witness was a paid police informant—was favorable and material impeachment evidence under Brady v. Maryland, and that the state court’s contrary ruling was an unreasonable application of clearly established Supreme Court law. Judge Duncan dissented on materiality.</description></item><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals Grants New Trial to Randy Halprin, Finding Trial Judge Was Actually Biased Against Him Because He Is Jewish</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/12/ex-parte-halprin-judicial-bias-new-trial/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/12/ex-parte-halprin-judicial-bias-new-trial/</guid><description>The court found by a preponderance of the evidence that the judge who presided over Halprin’s 2003 capital murder trial was actually biased against him because he is Jewish, held that actual judicial bias is structural error requiring no showing of harm, and remanded for a new trial. A second claim was dismissed as an abuse of the writ.</description></item></channel></rss>