<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>extraordinary writs on Texas Appeals Journal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/topics/extraordinary-writs/</link><description>Clinical descriptions of the Texas appellate decisions drawing the most press coverage.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 07:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://texasappeals.org/topics/extraordinary-writs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Convicting Court Lacked Jurisdiction Over Death-Row Inmate’s Constitutional Habeas Challenge to Execution Drugs</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/10/ex-parte-speer-capital-habeas/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/10/ex-parte-speer-capital-habeas/</guid><description>In a per curiam opinion, the court held that a Bowie County district court had no jurisdiction over a constitutional habeas application seeking to bar the Texas Department of Criminal Justice from using allegedly expired and fire-damaged pentobarbital in a scheduled execution, because such an injunction would function as a stay of execution that only the Court of Criminal Appeals may grant. The court did not reach the merits of the method-of-execution claims.</description></item></channel></rss>