<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>habeas corpus on Texas Appeals Journal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/topics/habeas-corpus/</link><description>Clinical descriptions of the Texas appellate decisions drawing the most press coverage.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 07:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://texasappeals.org/topics/habeas-corpus/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fifth Circuit Holds Noncitizens Present Without Admission Are Subject to Mandatory Detention Without Bond During Removal Proceedings</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2026/02/buenrostro-mendez-v-bondi-bond-hearings/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2026/02/buenrostro-mendez-v-bondi-bond-hearings/</guid><description>The court held that noncitizens present in the United States without having been admitted are “applicants for admission” who are “seeking admission” under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), and so must be detained without bond eligibility while removal proceedings are pending. It reversed two Southern District of Texas orders granting bond hearings. Judge Douglas dissented.</description></item><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals Grants Actual-Innocence Relief to Carmen Mejia in Travis County Felony-Murder Case</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2026/02/ex-parte-mejia-actual-innocence/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2026/02/ex-parte-mejia-actual-innocence/</guid><description>In a brief per curiam opinion with no stated analysis, the court agreed that Mejia established actual innocence, set aside her three convictions, and remanded her to the custody of the Travis County sheriff to answer the indictment. Judge Finley, joined by Judge Parker, agreed she is entitled to relief but would have granted it under Article 11.073 rather than on actual-innocence grounds.</description></item><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Convicting Court Lacked Jurisdiction Over Death-Row Inmate’s Constitutional Habeas Challenge to Execution Drugs</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/10/ex-parte-speer-capital-habeas/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/10/ex-parte-speer-capital-habeas/</guid><description>In a per curiam opinion, the court held that a Bowie County district court had no jurisdiction over a constitutional habeas application seeking to bar the Texas Department of Criminal Justice from using allegedly expired and fire-damaged pentobarbital in a scheduled execution, because such an injunction would function as a stay of execution that only the Court of Criminal Appeals may grant. The court did not reach the merits of the method-of-execution claims.</description></item><item><title>Fifth Circuit Panel Enjoins Removals Under Alien Enemies Act, Holding March 2025 Proclamation Does Not Identify an Invasion or Predatory Incursion</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/09/wmm-v-trump-alien-enemies-act-panel/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/09/wmm-v-trump-alien-enemies-act-panel/</guid><description>A divided panel held that the President’s fact-findings under the 1798 Act are unreviewable but the statutory labels attached to them are not, and that the findings in Proclamation No. 10903 do not describe an invasion or predatory incursion. Two judges concluded that, on the current record, the Government’s updated seven-day notice satisfies due process; the court remanded for evidence on a sufficient timeframe.</description></item><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals, on Rehearing, Withdraws 2024 Opinion and Holds Ethics Commission Referral Is Not a Precondition to Election-Law Prosecution</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/09/ex-parte-charette-rehearing/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/09/ex-parte-charette-rehearing/</guid><description>On the State’s motion for rehearing, the court withdrew its September 2024 opinion and affirmed the denial of pretrial habeas relief to a former judicial candidate. It held that neither the Texas Constitution nor Government Code Chapter 571 categorically bars a criminal prosecution for election-law offenses brought without a referral from the Texas Ethics Commission or exhaustion of its civil process, while reaffirming that the habeas claim was cognizable.</description></item><item><title>Supreme Court Enjoins Alien Enemies Act Removals of Detainees in Northern District of Texas and Vacates Fifth Circuit’s Dismissal of Their Appeal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/05/aarp-v-trump-alien-enemies-act-injunction/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/05/aarp-v-trump-alien-enemies-act-injunction/</guid><description>In a per curiam opinion, the Court held that the Fifth Circuit erred in dismissing the detainees’ appeal for lack of jurisdiction, concluded that the notice given on April 18 was inadequate, and enjoined removals under the Act pending further proceedings. The opinion states that it does not address the legality of removals under the Act.</description></item><item><title>Fifth Circuit Vacates Capital Murder Conviction of Brittany Holberg, Holding State Court Unreasonably Applied Brady to Undisclosed Informant Evidence</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/03/holberg-v-lumpkin-capital-habeas/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/03/holberg-v-lumpkin-capital-habeas/</guid><description>A divided panel held that evidence the State did not disclose—that a jailhouse witness was a paid police informant—was favorable and material impeachment evidence under Brady v. Maryland, and that the state court’s contrary ruling was an unreasonable application of clearly established Supreme Court law. Judge Duncan dissented on materiality.</description></item><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals Grants New Trial to Randy Halprin, Finding Trial Judge Was Actually Biased Against Him Because He Is Jewish</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/12/ex-parte-halprin-judicial-bias-new-trial/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/12/ex-parte-halprin-judicial-bias-new-trial/</guid><description>The court found by a preponderance of the evidence that the judge who presided over Halprin’s 2003 capital murder trial was actually biased against him because he is Jewish, held that actual judicial bias is structural error requiring no showing of harm, and remanded for a new trial. A second claim was dismissed as an abuse of the writ.</description></item><item><title>Supreme Court of Texas Holds House Committee’s Subpoena Cannot Be Judicially Enforced to Cancel Roberson Execution</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/11/in-re-texas-house-roberson-subpoena/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/11/in-re-texas-house-roberson-subpoena/</guid><description>The court denied a Texas House committee’s petition, holding that the separation of powers does not permit judicial enforcement of a legislative subpoena that would require canceling a long-scheduled execution. The opinion states that the dispute has nothing to do with Robert Roberson’s guilt or innocence.</description></item><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals Vacates Travis County Restraining Order That Had Blocked Robert Roberson’s Execution</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/11/in-re-tdcj-ex-rel-paxton-roberson-subpoena/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/11/in-re-tdcj-ex-rel-paxton-roberson-subpoena/</guid><description>In a per curiam opinion, the court held that a district court’s temporary restraining order enjoining the Texas Department of Criminal Justice from carrying out a death warrant had the effect of staying a scheduled execution and was subject to the court’s mandamus authority. The court vacated the order itself. Four judges dissented.</description></item><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals Grants Habeas Relief to Kerry Max Cook on Actual-Innocence Claim in 1977 Smith County Murder</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/07/ex-parte-cook-actual-innocence/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/07/ex-parte-cook-actual-innocence/</guid><description>The court held that newly discovered DNA evidence, combined with evidence of false testimony and State misconduct, established by clear and convincing evidence that no rational jury would convict Cook of the 1977 Tyler murder. It did not reach his remaining due-process claims, and the habeas court had recommended denying the actual-innocence claim.</description></item></channel></rss>