<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>home-rule cities on Texas Appeals Journal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/topics/home-rule-cities/</link><description>Clinical descriptions of the Texas appellate decisions drawing the most press coverage.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 07:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://texasappeals.org/topics/home-rule-cities/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Third Court of Appeals Dismisses Cities’ Challenge to Texas Regulatory Consistency Act for Lack of Standing</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/08/state-v-city-of-houston-hb-2127/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/08/state-v-city-of-houston-hb-2127/</guid><description>The court held that Houston, San Antonio and El Paso did not plead an injury-in-fact or an injury traceable to the State of Texas, reversed a trial-court judgment declaring House Bill 2127 unconstitutional, and dismissed the suit without prejudice. The court did not decide whether the Act is constitutional.</description></item><item><title>Supreme Court of Texas Orders Dallas to Remove Three Council-Initiated Charter Propositions From November Ballot</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/09/in-re-dallas-hero-charter-propositions/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/09/in-re-dallas-hero-charter-propositions/</guid><description>The court held that the ballot language for the City Council’s Propositions K, M and N was misleading because it did not disclose that each conflicted with and proposed to nullify a citizen-initiated charter amendment on the same ballot. It directed the City to remove the three propositions.</description></item></channel></rss>