<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Judge Edith H Jones on Texas Appeals Journal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/topics/judge-edith-h-jones/</link><description>Clinical descriptions of the Texas appellate decisions drawing the most press coverage.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 07:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://texasappeals.org/topics/judge-edith-h-jones/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fifth Circuit Holds Noncitizens Present Without Admission Are Subject to Mandatory Detention Without Bond During Removal Proceedings</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2026/02/buenrostro-mendez-v-bondi-bond-hearings/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2026/02/buenrostro-mendez-v-bondi-bond-hearings/</guid><description>The court held that noncitizens present in the United States without having been admitted are “applicants for admission” who are “seeking admission” under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), and so must be detained without bond eligibility while removal proceedings are pending. It reversed two Southern District of Texas orders granting bond hearings. Judge Douglas dissented.</description></item><item><title>Fifth Circuit Reverses Contempt Fines in Texas Foster Care Case and Orders Reassignment to Another District Judge</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/11/md-v-abbott-foster-care-contempt-reassignment/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/11/md-v-abbott-foster-care-contempt-reassignment/</guid><description>A Fifth Circuit panel held that $100,000-per-day contempt fines against a Texas Health and Human Services Commission official were a criminal sanction imposed without the required protections and barred by state sovereign immunity, and that the state had substantially complied with the orders at issue. The court also directed that the foster care class action be reassigned to a different district judge.</description></item></channel></rss>