<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan on Texas Appeals Journal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/topics/judge-stuart-kyle-duncan/</link><description>Clinical descriptions of the Texas appellate decisions drawing the most press coverage.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 07:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://texasappeals.org/topics/judge-stuart-kyle-duncan/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fifth Circuit Vacates Capital Murder Conviction of Brittany Holberg, Holding State Court Unreasonably Applied Brady to Undisclosed Informant Evidence</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2025/03/holberg-v-lumpkin-capital-habeas/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2025/03/holberg-v-lumpkin-capital-habeas/</guid><description>A divided panel held that evidence the State did not disclose—that a jailhouse witness was a paid police informant—was favorable and material impeachment evidence under Brady v. Maryland, and that the state court’s contrary ruling was an unreasonable application of clearly established Supreme Court law. Judge Duncan dissented on materiality.</description></item><item><title>Fifth Circuit Holds Texas Is Entitled to Preliminary Injunction Against Border Patrol Cutting of Concertina Wire Near Eagle Pass</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/12/texas-v-dhs-eagle-pass-concertina-wire/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/12/texas-v-dhs-eagle-pass-concertina-wire/</guid><description>The court held that § 702 of the Administrative Procedure Act waives the United States’ sovereign immunity for Texas’s state-law trespass claims, that neither intergovernmental immunity nor 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f)(1) bars the suit, and that Texas satisfied the preliminary-injunction factors. It granted a modified injunction; Judge Ramirez dissented.</description></item></channel></rss>