<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>mandamus on Texas Appeals Journal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/topics/mandamus/</link><description>Clinical descriptions of the Texas appellate decisions drawing the most press coverage.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 07:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://texasappeals.org/topics/mandamus/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Supreme Court of Texas Holds House Committee’s Subpoena Cannot Be Judicially Enforced to Cancel Roberson Execution</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/11/in-re-texas-house-roberson-subpoena/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/11/in-re-texas-house-roberson-subpoena/</guid><description>The court denied a Texas House committee’s petition, holding that the separation of powers does not permit judicial enforcement of a legislative subpoena that would require canceling a long-scheduled execution. The opinion states that the dispute has nothing to do with Robert Roberson’s guilt or innocence.</description></item><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals Vacates Travis County Restraining Order That Had Blocked Robert Roberson’s Execution</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/11/in-re-tdcj-ex-rel-paxton-roberson-subpoena/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/11/in-re-tdcj-ex-rel-paxton-roberson-subpoena/</guid><description>In a per curiam opinion, the court held that a district court’s temporary restraining order enjoining the Texas Department of Criminal Justice from carrying out a death warrant had the effect of staying a scheduled execution and was subject to the court’s mandamus authority. The court vacated the order itself. Four judges dissented.</description></item><item><title>Supreme Court of Texas Denies State’s Emergency Mandamus Petition Over State Fair Handgun Policy</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/10/in-re-state-state-fair-handgun-ban/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/10/in-re-state-state-fair-handgun-ban/</guid><description>The court denied the State’s petition for writ of mandamus and its emergency motion for temporary relief in an order that gives no reasons. A three-justice concurrence stated that the State had not argued that Texas law obligates the privately operated State Fair to allow handguns.</description></item><item><title>Supreme Court of Texas Orders Dallas to Remove Three Council-Initiated Charter Propositions From November Ballot</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/09/in-re-dallas-hero-charter-propositions/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/09/in-re-dallas-hero-charter-propositions/</guid><description>The court held that the ballot language for the City Council’s Propositions K, M and N was misleading because it did not disclose that each conflicted with and proposed to nullify a citizen-initiated charter amendment on the same ballot. It directed the City to remove the three propositions.</description></item></channel></rss>