<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nonparties on Texas Appeals Journal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/topics/nonparties/</link><description>Clinical descriptions of the Texas appellate decisions drawing the most press coverage.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 07:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://texasappeals.org/topics/nonparties/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fifth Circuit Affirms Denial of Intervention in United States’ Suit Over Texas In-State Tuition Provisions</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2026/07/united-states-v-texas-dream-act-intervention/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2026/07/united-states-v-texas-dream-act-intervention/</guid><description>The court held that intervention to defend two Texas Education Code provisions was futile because 8 U.S.C. § 1623(a) preempts them as to aliens not lawfully present, and dismissed the would-be intervenors’ remaining claims for want of appellate jurisdiction. Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez dissented.</description></item><item><title>Fifteenth Court of Appeals Affirms Temporary Injunction Against Attorney General’s Prosecutor-Reporting Rules as to Named Plaintiffs, Reverses It as to Nonparties</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2026/01/paxton-v-garza-local-prosecutors/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2026/01/paxton-v-garza-local-prosecutors/</guid><description>The court held that Section 41.006 of the Government Code does not confer rulemaking authority on the Attorney General, so the suing prosecutors showed a probable right to relief against rules requiring reports from large-county district and county attorneys. It limited the injunction to the named plaintiffs and remanded.</description></item></channel></rss>