<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>preponderance of the evidence on Texas Appeals Journal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/topics/preponderance-of-the-evidence/</link><description>Clinical descriptions of the Texas appellate decisions drawing the most press coverage.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 07:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://texasappeals.org/topics/preponderance-of-the-evidence/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals Grants Actual-Innocence Relief to Carmen Mejia in Travis County Felony-Murder Case</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2026/02/ex-parte-mejia-actual-innocence/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2026/02/ex-parte-mejia-actual-innocence/</guid><description>In a brief per curiam opinion with no stated analysis, the court agreed that Mejia established actual innocence, set aside her three convictions, and remanded her to the custody of the Travis County sheriff to answer the indictment. Judge Finley, joined by Judge Parker, agreed she is entitled to relief but would have granted it under Article 11.073 rather than on actual-innocence grounds.</description></item><item><title>Court of Criminal Appeals Grants New Trial to Randy Halprin, Finding Trial Judge Was Actually Biased Against Him Because He Is Jewish</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2024/12/ex-parte-halprin-judicial-bias-new-trial/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 07:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2024/12/ex-parte-halprin-judicial-bias-new-trial/</guid><description>The court found by a preponderance of the evidence that the judge who presided over Halprin’s 2003 capital murder trial was actually biased against him because he is Jewish, held that actual judicial bias is structural error requiring no showing of harm, and remanded for a new trial. A second claim was dismissed as an abuse of the writ.</description></item></channel></rss>