<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Thirteenth Court of Appeals on Texas Appeals Journal</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/topics/thirteenth-court-of-appeals/</link><description>Clinical descriptions of the Texas appellate decisions drawing the most press coverage.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 07:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://texasappeals.org/topics/thirteenth-court-of-appeals/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Supreme Court of Texas Reinstates Summary Judgment for H-E-B in Slip-and-Fall Case, Holding Earlier Roof Leaks Elsewhere in Store Did Not Show Constructive Knowledge of Puddle</title><link>https://texasappeals.org/2026/04/heb-v-peterson/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://texasappeals.org/2026/04/heb-v-peterson/</guid><description>The court held that a plaintiff responding to a no-evidence summary judgment motion must present some evidence of how long a dangerous condition existed, and that evidence of earlier roof leaks in other parts of a grocery store did not raise a fact issue on the grocer’s constructive knowledge of a puddle in the toy aisle. The court reversed the Thirteenth Court of Appeals and reinstated the trial court’s judgment.</description></item></channel></rss>